Make me gag. Look at me, look at me. I’m not an athlete. I don’t threaten your power…Some of the captions to the September 2004: ‘Women of the Olympics” issue make me cringe to call myself an athlete. I understand the financial and social incentives for these athletes to be photographed and quoted for these articles. However, to subject yourself to the male hegemony as they have done in this article seems to give up any power they have gained through their self-assertion as an athlete.
(see article Posing for Magazines: Athlete or Sexual Plaything?)
This article outlines the debate of the use of male practice players among NCAA women’s teams nationwide. The NCAA Committee on Women’s Athletics has deemed these players problematic, finding it necessary to limit or ban their use among NCAA teams.
One issue lies in the question of the need of these male players. Used mainly in sports like basketball, soccer, and volleyball, many coaches argue that top female athletes beed male competitors to better their skills.
- “‘They make us better, plain and simple,’ says Brenda Frese, head coach of the Maryland [basketball] team. ‘They’re bigger, stronger, quicker, and they can raise the level of intensity of practice.'”
However, the Committee on Women’s Athletics finds the need to limit the use of male practice players. When teams and coaches alike have said that the male’s do not take away practice time from any of the female athletes, how might the use of the male practice players take away from the female athlete’s experience? What about the males who participate – are they demasculated? Practice player for Maryland’s women’s basketball team, Sean McGrew, was greatly affected by the talent of the women be played against.
- “Defending Jade Perry, a reserve forward, quickly taught Mr. McGrew what to expect. ‘Jade hit two fadeaway jump shots on me the first two times I was guarding her,’ he says. ‘I was like, OK, I’ve got to pick this up.'”
Does this call into question Mr. McGrew’s masculinity? If he is challenged by a woman in a contest of physical strength and athletic prowess, how can he be defined as a man within a culture that depends deeply on the disparities between men and women?
Is the use of male practice players at odds with Title IX’s goals? Physiologically, men, as a whole, have the capacity to be stronger than females. If using male practice players would only strengthen the women’s skills, doesn’t their use improve women’s sports? Or, does it call into question fundamental flaws that still exist in the NCAA in the form of discrepancies between male and female sports? This article marks an interesting point in the progression of female collegiate sports teams after Title IX.