Category Archives: Men in sports

Quotas and Gender Equality

This video demonstrates a media spin on the effects of Title IX. By using phrases refering to men’s programs that “had to be eliminated” due to “quotas and gender equality”, the video sends a message that the men’s wrestling team used as an example was cut due to Title IX. The school claims that the team was cut because the wrestling funding now had to be used to fund a women’s sport. However, the failure here is to properly allocate the university’s funds. While the University of Florida’s football team brings in millions a year, a small fraction of its generous funding would have kept the wrestling team alive on UF’s campus. This problem of funding discrepancy among different teams at universities across the nation is often hidden behind the facade of Title IX’s negative effect of men’s sports.

Male Practice Players

This article outlines the debate of the use of male practice players among NCAA women’s teams nationwide. The NCAA Committee on Women’s Athletics has deemed these players problematic, finding it necessary to limit or ban their use among NCAA teams.

One issue lies in the question of the need of these male players. Used mainly in sports like basketball, soccer, and volleyball, many coaches argue that top female athletes beed male competitors to better their skills. 

  •  “‘They make us better, plain and simple,’ says Brenda Frese, head coach of the Maryland [basketball] team. ‘They’re bigger,  stronger, quicker, and they can raise the level of intensity of practice.'”

However, the Committee on Women’s Athletics finds the need to limit the use of male practice players. When teams and coaches alike have said that the male’s do not take away practice time from any of the female athletes, how might the use of the male practice players take away from the female athlete’s experience? What about the males who participate – are they demasculated? Practice player for Maryland’s women’s basketball team, Sean McGrew, was greatly affected by the talent of the women be played against.

  • “Defending Jade Perry, a reserve forward, quickly taught Mr. McGrew what to expect. ‘Jade hit two fadeaway jump shots on me the first two times I was guarding her,’ he says. ‘I was like, OK, I’ve got to pick this up.'”

 Does this call into question Mr. McGrew’s masculinity? If he is challenged by a woman in a contest of physical strength and athletic prowess, how can he be defined as a man within a culture that depends deeply on the disparities between men and women?

Is the use of male practice players at odds with Title IX’s goals? Physiologically, men, as a whole, have the capacity to be stronger than females. If using male practice players would only strengthen the women’s skills, doesn’t their use improve women’s sports? Or, does it call into question fundamental flaws that still exist in the NCAA in the form of discrepancies between male and female sports? This article marks an interesting point in the progression of female collegiate sports teams after Title IX.

Title IX’s blanket

Title IX in recent years has been criticized for its use in colleges and universities to cover how they are allocating funds to a few high powered teams. This article examines the case of James Madisons University, where teams from both sexes have been cut in supposed accordance with Title IX laws.